All About A Finance Broker

Evict a tenant | Does defamation fall under freedom of speech?

Nov 22
 
 
 

Yes, defamation is a type of speech that is protected by freedom of speech in the United Kingdom. This means that you are free to express your opinions on any subject, even if they are critical of someone else. However, you may be held liable for any damages that your statements cause.

Under defamation law, a statement is considered to be defamatory if it causes harm to someone’s reputation. This could include damaging their financial prospects or causing mental distress. In the UK, slander and libel are both forms of defamation. Slander refers to oral statements while libel refers to written statements.

Accordingly, you need to take care when making statements about someone else, particularly if you are writing or publishing something substantial. If someone feels that their reputation has been affected by your statement, they can make a claim for defamation. In such cases, the burden of proof is on them to prove that what you said was false and caused damage to their reputation.

If you are found to be liable for defamation, you could face financial penalties or even a prison sentence. Therefore, it is important to make sure that you only express opinions that are true and do not contain any malicious intent. Additionally, if possible, it is advisable to include details of your sources when making statements about someone else. This provides evidence for your claims and can help to protect you from any potential liability.

In summary, defamation is a type of speech that is protected by freedom of speech in the UK but it does come with certain risks. When making statements about someone else, make sure that they are true and do not contain malicious intent.

The Defamation Act 2013

The Defamation Act 2013 is a UK law that sets out the rules for defamation. It replaces the old defamation law, which was known as the Defamation Act 1996.

The key provisions of the Act are as follows:

  1. It is now easier to make a claim for defamation. In order to make a claim, you no longer need to prove that you have suffered financial loss or emotional distress.
  2. It is now easier to get injunctions to prevent someone from publishing defamatory material about you.
  3. The Act creates a new defense of truth. This means that you can defend a defamation claim by proving that your statement is true.
  4. The Act makes it easier to get damages from someone who has published defamatory material about you. You can now recover your general damages (e.g. for lost earnings) and your special damages (e.g. for medical expenses).
  5. The Act allows for punitive damages in exceptional cases. This means that you can receive an additional sum of money as punishment for publishing defamatory material about someone else.
  6. The Act also provides protection for internet service providers. This means that they may not be liable for any defamatory material published on their platform if they are unaware of it and have taken reasonable steps to remove it when notified.

In conclusion, the Defamation Act 2013 is an important law that sets out the rules for defamation in the UK. It provides protection for individuals who have been defamed and makes it easier to get compensation if someone has caused them harm. Additionally, it provides some protection for internet service providers from liability for defamatory material that is published on their platform without their knowledge.

Ultimately, freedom of speech is a valuable right but it comes with certain risks. Therefore, it is important to act responsibly and take care when making statements about someone else, as this could potentially lead to a costly defamation claim.

 
 
 

The defenses to a defamation claim

There are several defenses to a defamation claim. These include the following:

  1. The truth defense. This means that you can defend a defamation claim by proving that your statement is true.
  2. The privilege defense. This means that you can defend a defamation claim if your statement was made in a privileged context, such as in a court of law or during parliamentary proceedings.
  3. The fair comment defense. This means that you can defend a defamation claim if your statement is an opinion that is based on facts that are true and published without malice.
  4. The innocent dissemination defense. This means that you can defend a defamation claim if you had no knowledge of the defamatory material and took reasonable steps to remove it when notified.

In conclusion, there are several defenses to a defamation claim that can help protect you from liability or reduce your damages award in the event of a successful claim. However, it is important to remember that the best way to protect yourself from a defamation claim is to ensure that any statement you make about someone else is true and does not contain malicious intent. That way you can be sure of avoiding potential liability for defamation in the UK or any other jurisdiction.

risks of not protecting

How do you know if you've been defamed?

If you have been the victim of defamation, there are several things you can do to prove it. Firstly, you can gather evidence of the defamatory statements that have been made about you. This can include copies of the article or post, screenshots, and any other relevant documentation.

You can also contact the person or organization who published the defamatory material and ask them to remove it. If they refuse to do so, you can take legal action.

Finally, you can speak to a lawyer about your options and whether you have a case for defamation. They will be able to advise you on the best course of action and help you to bring a claim against the person or organization who published the defamatory material.

In conclusion, it is important to act quickly if you believe that you have been defamed, as this will increase your chances of success in any legal action that you may take. Remember that gathering evidence and speaking to a lawyer should be your first steps in order to ensure that you take the right course of action.

Finally, it is important to remember that while the law provides some protection against defamation, prevention is always better than cure. Everyone should strive to ensure that any statement they make about another person or organization is true and without malicious intent in order to avoid potential liability for defamation. In this way, we can all help promote an environment of respectful dialogue and responsible communication.

What can you do if you've been defamed?

If you have been the victim of defamation, there are several things you can do to prove it and seek damages. Firstly, you can gather evidence of the defamatory statements that have been made about you. This can include copies of the article or post, screenshots, and any other relevant documentation.

You can also contact the person or organization who published the defamatory material and ask them to remove it. If they refuse to do so, you can take legal action.

Finally, you can speak to a lawyer about your options and whether you have a case for defamation. They will be able to advise you on the best course of action and help you to bring a claim against the person or organization who published the defamatory material.

Recent cases involving defamation in the United Kingdom

1. PJS and Others v News Group Newspapers Ltd

The high-profile case of PJS and Others v News Group Newspapers Ltd in January 2016 made headlines when it became the first celebrity ‘privacy injunction’ to be overturned by UK courts.

The case questionably protects celebrities’ privacy to a great degree, and whether or not the UK’s libel and privacy laws will be adequate going into the digital age.

The Court of Appeal ruled that the injunction preventing the publication of details about an alleged extramarital affair was invalid, stating that it was not in the public interest to prevent publication. This ruling is seen as a victory for freedom of speech and open justice.

photo-by-beasty
 
 
 

2. Wightman v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union

The Wightman case is a constitutional legal battle currently underway in the UK concerning the role of parliament in the Brexit process.

In November 2018, the Scottish Court of Session ruled that the UK government’s attempt to unilaterally invoke Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty (the mechanism for leaving the EU) was unlawful, as it did not involve an act of parliament.

The UK government is appealing this ruling, with the case set to be heard by the Supreme Court in December 2018. The outcome of this case could have a significant impact on the Brexit process. It could provide parliament with greater control over the negotiations and even prevent a so-called ‘no-deal Brexit.

3. Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd

In the case of Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd, the claimant (Campbell) brought a libel action against the defendant (Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd) after a number of articles were published in the defendant’s newspapers that accused the claimant of accepting payments for sexual services.

The articles were based on information provided to the newspapers by an anonymous source, and the defendant claimed that they had carried out adequate checks to verify the allegations before publication.

However, the High Court found that the defendant had not carried out adequate checks before publication and that they were therefore liable for libel. The court awarded damages to the claimant. This case is seen as an important victory for the protection of privacy and freedom of expression.

Overall, these cases demonstrate that while defamatory statements may be made in a variety of contexts, legal action can be taken to protect your reputation and provide compensation when necessary. Furthermore, it shows that the UK courts are committed to protecting free speech and open justice when it comes to defamation cases.

4. Goddard v Mail on Sunday

In the Goddard v Mail on Sunday case, the claimant (Goddard) brought a libel action against the defendant (Mail on Sunday) after a number of articles were published in the defendant’s newspaper that accused the claimant of being a pedophile.

The articles were based on information provided to the newspapers by an anonymous source, and the defendant claimed that they had carried out adequate checks to verify the allegations before publication.

However, the High Court found that the defendant had not carried out adequate checks before publication and that they were therefore liable for libel. The court awarded damages to the claimant. This case is seen as an important victory for the protection of privacy and freedom of expression.

Overall, these cases demonstrate that while defamatory statements may be made in a variety of contexts, legal action can be taken to protect your reputation and provide compensation when necessary. Furthermore, it shows that the UK courts are committed to protecting free speech and open justice when it comes to defamation cases. It is important for individuals to understand their legal rights and to take action when necessary, in order to protect their reputation from false or malicious statements.

 

Find Us Here!

 

Things To Do in Chigwell 

Chigwell  News